Talk:Toll road

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport High‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Toll road article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

Prevalence in Canada

The article claims that BOT (Build-Operate-Transfer) toll roads are prevalent in Canada. This is untrue. The article 'List of Toll Roads' list many structures in Canada claimed as toll roads. I am familiar only with Ontario, where only one such road exists to the best of my knowledge, Highway 407. That is hardly 'prevalent.' The list also includes many bridges, which are not toll roads, but toll bridges, surely a different category. All but one listing for Ontario are bridges, none of which are BOT structures. Again, prevalence is overstated, in the province with the highest population in Canada. I suggest that 'Canada' be removed from the list in this article as a location where BOT is 'prevalent.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grandma Roses (talk • contribs) 20:44, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-tur2.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Perey (talk) 11:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS If some etymological information on "turnpike" is needed in the article, it can probably best be placed in the History section where "turnpike" is first mentioned, not in a misleadingly-named "Origin" section. Also, the source mentioned would be a good reference, but as it answers a specific question (and refutes a specific false etymology), it doesn't make a good source for article text, even setting copyright problems aside.

"Collection methods" too US-centric

I tagged the "Collection methods" as too biased on the United States (only foreign mention is on Ontario, Canada). The examples shown are mostly those in the United States and no other foreign mention can be seen here. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 09:19, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect statement

This statement is made in the article: "Maryland Route 200 and the Triangle Expressway in North Carolina were the first toll roads built without toll booths, with drivers charged via ETC or by optical license plate recognition and are billed by mail." This statement is false without qualification. Both of these tool roads started operating in 2011. Ontario Highway 407 started operating, totally without toll booths, in 1997, many years before the US highways. Indeed, a paragraph later starts with "Highway 407 in the province of Ontario, Canada, has no toll booths, and instead reads a transponder […]" The statement about the US toll roads needs to be qualified or corrected. Chamblyen (talk) 02:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Peaje" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Peaje. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 18#Peaje until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 19:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]